IFJ: Greater efforts needed to confront obstacles for media

International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) states that despite progress and promises made by the current Maldivian government to address press freedom, there are still obstacles for journalists in the country.

During an evaluation mission in the Maldives, IFJ met with journalists, media leaders and union stakeholders and notes a critical need for the establishment of an industrial legislative framework for media and other workers in the country.

Issues brought to light during the meetings included recent changes to the highly problematic Evidence Act remained an overarching concern in discussions, as well as a number of other issues.

“The IFJ was gravely concerned to learn of the widespread industry practice of ‘docking’ journalists’ salaries by media companies when journalists were deemed to be underperforming or not filing a set number of stories per day. This arbitrary practice is a violation of journalists’ labor rights and is not conducive to the production of quality journalism,” said IFJ.

“Coupled with this is a widespread lack of employment contracts and obstacles to accreditation – especially for freelance journalists. There is a vital need for worker rights to be protected which can only happen by strengthening the labor rights framework.”

IFJ called on the Maldivian government for an urgent investigation into ‘shell media companies’ established as political influence fronts and for transparent reporting of that investigation.

“The issue is particularly pertinent given that all registered media companies are eligible to vote for members of the Maldives Media Council (MMC). With the new MMC election dates announced this week, the IFJ and its affiliate, the Maldives Journalists Association (MJA), maintain that media outlets not in the regular service of journalism production should be removed from voting contention in the upcoming elections to ensure legitimate media worker interests are represented,” said IFJ.

Key issues identified by the IFJ were:

• The continuing influence of political appointments to the Maldives Broadcasting Commission and Public Service Media;
• A rife and industry-wide practice of docking journalist salaries, a practice which violates labour rights;
• Women journalists leaving the industry due to cultural and industry pressures;
• A lack of professional training opportunities for journalists and awareness training on media rights and responsibilities;
• Accreditation obstacles for freelance journalists;
• Registration of ‘shell media’ companies, whose politically motivated votes continue to influence the composition and legitimacy of the Maldives Media Council;
• The impact of the culture of impunity and religious extremism on media independence and diverse voices in the Maldives;
• Timely access to information and turnaround responses from government and state departments;
• The need for a revised code of ethics in line with international standards;
• The prevalence of journalists employed without formal job contracts;
• A lack of an industrial or legislative framework to protect the rights of workers, including media workers.

The IFJ noted concerns of journalists during trainings with its affiliate, the MJA. Discussions centered on issues including ongoing impunity for threats, attacks and forced disappearances of media workers, political influences on regulatory bodies, impediments to sustained careers in journalism for women, labor and employment rights issues and the ongoing lack of an industrial framework for Maldivian workers across the board.

The IFJ also met with leaders from the Maldivian Trade Union Congress and has welcomed moves by the media industry to join lobbying efforts to the government on worker rights and protections. Following this meeting, the MJA Executive Committee unanimously passed a motion to launch a membership bid on August 24 to join the nation’s Trade Union Congress.

The IFJ recommended the need for a media working group to improve communications between the police and the media. It also highlighted the need for greater female representation in unions and decision-making roles.