date_range
Monday 23 Dec 2024
LOCAL EDITION
close
LOCAL EDITION
Former US president Donald Trump at an election rally in Grand Rapids in the US state of Michigan. (Photo/AFP)
A court in New York has rejected a last-ditch effort by former US president Donald Trump to delay his hush money trial scheduled to begin in New York on April 15.
Justice Juan M. Merchan of the New York State Supreme Court deemed the former president's request untimely on Wednesday, ruling that his lawyers had "myriad opportunities" to raise the immunity issue before they finally did so in a March 7 court filing.
The timing of the defence filing "raises real questions about the sincerity and actual purpose of the motion," Merchan wrote in a six-page decision.
Lawyers for Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, had asked last month to adjourn the New York trial indefinitely until Trump’s immunity claim in his Washington DC election interference case is resolved.
Trump contends he is immune from prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. His lawyers argue some evidence in the hush money case is from his time in the White House and constitutes official acts. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments April 25.
Trump lawyer Todd Blanche declined comment. The Manhattan district attorney’s office also declined to comment.
Trump's hush-money trial, the first of his four criminal cases scheduled to go before a jury, was delayed from March 25 to April 15.
The hush money case centres on allegations that Trump falsified his company’s internal records to hide the true nature of payments to his former lawyer Michael Cohen, who helped Trump bury negative stories during his 2016 presidential campaign.
Among other things, Cohen paid adult movie actor Stormy Daniels $130,000 to suppress her claims of an extramarital sexual encounter with Trump years earlier.
Trump's lawyers argue that some evidence Manhattan prosecutors plan to introduce at the hush money trial, including messages he posted on social media in 2018 about money paid to Cohen, were from his time as president and constituted official acts.
Trump pleaded not guilty last year to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. He has denied having a sexual encounter with Daniels, and his lawyers argue the payments to Cohen were legitimate legal expenses and not part of any cover-up.
Legally untested
A federal judge last year rejected Trump's claim that allegations in the hush money indictment involved official duties, nixing his bid to move the case from state court to federal court.
Had the case been moved to federal court, Trump's lawyers could've tried to get the charges dismissed on the grounds that federal officials have immunity from prosecution over actions taken as part of their official duties.
The question of whether a former president is immune from federal prosecution for official acts taken in office is legally untested.
Prosecutors in the Washington case have said no such immunity exists and that, in any event, none of the actions Trump is alleged to have taken in the indictment —charging him with plotting to overturn the 2020 presidential election after he lost to Democrat Joe Biden — count as official acts.
___
Source: TRT
